http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/27/the-rightful-owner/ From Greg Neyman Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:13:55 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/27/the-rightful-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-520 kay Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:40:01 +0000 http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=156#comment-520 why is this "creation science rebuttals" article so against young earth creationism? there is absolutly no evidence that the earth is old, so there is no reason to beleive that the earth is old. the Bible (which, by the way, is all true) tells how the earth was formed (it only took 6 literal, 24-hour days). also, if you read it carefully and thouroughly, there are evidences of a young earth. so why do you, who claims to be a Christian, believe in an old earth? do you also believe in macroevolution? because if you do, there are plenty of evidences against that. one of the most obviouse arguments against evolution is the lack of fossilized evidence supporting it (like all the missing missing links), but even stronger than that is the science of molecular biology. i dare you to study molecular biology with an open, unbiased mind, and i'm sure that you will notice several inconsistencies between it and the evolutionist's beliefs. evolution is nothing more than an unproven theory. why is this “creation science rebuttals” article so against young earth creationism? there is absolutly no evidence that the earth is old, so there is no reason to beleive that the earth is old. the Bible (which, by the way, is all true) tells how the earth was formed (it only took 6 literal, 24-hour days). also, if you read it carefully and thouroughly, there are evidences of a young earth. so why do you, who claims to be a Christian, believe in an old earth? do you also believe in macroevolution? because if you do, there are plenty of evidences against that. one of the most obviouse arguments against evolution is the lack of fossilized evidence supporting it (like all the missing missing links), but even stronger than that is the science of molecular biology. i dare you to study molecular biology with an open, unbiased mind, and i’m sure that you will notice several inconsistencies between it and the evolutionist’s beliefs. evolution is nothing more than an unproven theory.

]]>