<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coconino Sandstone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/26/coconino-sandstone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/26/coconino-sandstone/</link>
	<description>From Greg Neyman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:13:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GN</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/26/coconino-sandstone/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 04:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=226#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Tim,
   I know where I got it (370/2=185), however, I must dig deeper to find out why I did it this way.  Austin divides rocks into Early Flood and Late Flood, hence I may have just divided the entire time in half.  It is probably better to use 150.  I&#039;ll probably make this adjustment after I look into it again.  Thanks.
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,<br />
   I know where I got it (370/2=185), however, I must dig deeper to find out why I did it this way.  Austin divides rocks into Early Flood and Late Flood, hence I may have just divided the entire time in half.  It is probably better to use 150.  I&#8217;ll probably make this adjustment after I look into it again.  Thanks.<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Helble</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/26/coconino-sandstone/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Helble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=226#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Hey Greg - In your review of Chapter 4 of Grand Canyon: Monument to Catastrophe, you state:

&quot;Here is where the Flood model for these rock layers really disintegrates.  These 4,000 feet of strata provide ample evidence for millions of years.  By the young earth creation science model, the Grand Canyon layers are all &quot;early flood.&quot;  Since the waters prevailed on the earth about 370 days, these layers all had to form in the first 185 days of the Flood.  That is a deposition rate of 21 feet of sediment per day!&quot;

Since Austin says the &quot;early Flood&quot; duration was 150 days, I was wondering you you used 185 days instead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Greg &#8211; In your review of Chapter 4 of Grand Canyon: Monument to Catastrophe, you state:</p>
<p>&#8220;Here is where the Flood model for these rock layers really disintegrates.  These 4,000 feet of strata provide ample evidence for millions of years.  By the young earth creation science model, the Grand Canyon layers are all &#8220;early flood.&#8221;  Since the waters prevailed on the earth about 370 days, these layers all had to form in the first 185 days of the Flood.  That is a deposition rate of 21 feet of sediment per day!&#8221;</p>
<p>Since Austin says the &#8220;early Flood&#8221; duration was 150 days, I was wondering you you used 185 days instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
