<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Fun of Creationists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/04/15/making-fun-of-creationists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/04/15/making-fun-of-creationists/</link>
	<description>From Greg Neyman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:13:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/04/15/making-fun-of-creationists/comment-page-1/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=251#comment-737</guid>
		<description>I agree with this post.  I have been listening to the Jonathan Park Audio Adventure series (produced by Vision Forum and the Institute for Creation Research). More than once, I have heard the characters make fun of evolutionary ideas, calling them &#039;silly&#039; and &#039;ridiculous&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this post.  I have been listening to the Jonathan Park Audio Adventure series (produced by Vision Forum and the Institute for Creation Research). More than once, I have heard the characters make fun of evolutionary ideas, calling them &#8217;silly&#8217; and &#8216;ridiculous&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Hayes</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/04/15/making-fun-of-creationists/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=251#comment-546</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just looked at the &quot;Answers Research Journal&quot; --- pretty neat, especially since it is peer-reviewed.  Seems like nobody really has positive proof of how God made things or when.  I think the Fall and God&#039;s judgement have really &quot;messed up&quot; the physical records we find today.  So, I&#039;ll keep reading both old and young creation ideas and hope that both camps can work together rather than at odds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just looked at the &#8220;Answers Research Journal&#8221; &#8212; pretty neat, especially since it is peer-reviewed.  Seems like nobody really has positive proof of how God made things or when.  I think the Fall and God&#8217;s judgement have really &#8220;messed up&#8221; the physical records we find today.  So, I&#8217;ll keep reading both old and young creation ideas and hope that both camps can work together rather than at odds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
