<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Answers In Creation Blog &#187; Answers in Genesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://answersincreation.org/blog/category/creationblog/answers-in-genesis-creationblog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog</link>
	<description>From Greg Neyman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Coconino Sandstone</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/26/coconino-sandstone/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/26/coconino-sandstone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coconino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandstone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Coconino Sandstone is a desert sandstone that is prominent in the Grand Canyon.  Young earth creationists commonly attack this sandstone, trying to prove that it was deposited underwater.  In this rebuttal, the claims of one of these attacks are examined.  Click here to read this article.
NOTE:  Anyone can comment without registering.  All comments are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Coconino Sandstone is a desert sandstone that is prominent in the Grand Canyon.  Young earth creationists commonly attack this sandstone, trying to prove that it was deposited underwater.  In this rebuttal, the claims of one of these attacks are examined.  <a title="Coconino Sandstone" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/coconino.htm" target="_blank">Click here</a> to read this article.</p>
<p><em>NOTE:  Anyone can comment without registering.  All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible.  Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/26/coconino-sandstone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Floating Forest Theory</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/22/the-floating-forest-theory/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/22/the-floating-forest-theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers in genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floating forest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Young earth creationists claim that the world&#8217;s coal reserves can be explained by great mats of vegetation that floated the worlds oceans, and then sank during Noah&#8217;s Flood.  However, there are some major problems with their theory.  Click here to read the rebuttal to this young earth claim.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Young earth creationists claim that the world&#8217;s coal reserves can be explained by great mats of vegetation that floated the worlds oceans, and then sank during Noah&#8217;s Flood.  However, there are some major problems with their theory.  <a title="Floating Forest Theory" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/floating.htm" target="_blank">Click here</a> to read the rebuttal to this young earth claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2010/01/22/the-floating-forest-theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Earth Creationism on Trial &#8211; Review Completed</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/09/01/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-review-completed/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/09/01/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-review-completed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old earth creationism on trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final installment of the review of the young earth book &#8220;Old Earth Creationism on Trial&#8221; has now been posted.  This final section reviews the appendixes in the book.  Many thanks to Ruben Baron for his hard work in creating this thorough review.  His review shows how shallow the arguments in the book are, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final installment of the review of the young earth book &#8220;Old Earth Creationism on Trial&#8221; has now been posted.  This <a title="Old Earth Creationism on Trial" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/bookreview/oec_trial/oec_trial_appendix.htm" target="_blank">final section</a> reviews the appendixes in the book.  Many thanks to Ruben Baron for his hard work in creating this thorough review.  His review shows how shallow the arguments in the book are, and reveals the depths that some young earth creationists will sink to in order to defend their unscientific beliefs.</p>
<p><em>NOTE:  Anyone can comment without registering.  All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible.  Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/09/01/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-review-completed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Earth Creationism on Trial &#8211; Chapter 9</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/08/25/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-9/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/08/25/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers in genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old earth creationism on trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just posted the review for Chapter 9.  The appendixes also have a review, and that will be posted in the next couple of days.
NOTE:  Anyone can comment without registering.  All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible.  Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just posted the <a title="Old Earth Creationism on Trial - Chapter 9" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/bookreview/oec_trial/oec_trial_9.htm" target="_blank">review for Chapter 9</a>.  The appendixes also have a review, and that will be posted in the next couple of days.</p>
<p><em>NOTE:  Anyone can comment without registering.  All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible.  Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/08/25/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Earth Creationism on Trial &#8211; Chapter 8</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/07/24/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-8/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/07/24/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers in genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason lisle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim chaffey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest chapter to be reviewed has just been posted to the website.  Chapter 8 is one of the longest chapters, and once again, Ruben Baron has done an excellent job in pointing out the faults of this young earth book.
NOTE:  Anyone can comment without registering.  All comments are held pending review, and will not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="Old Earth Creationism on Trial - Chapter 8" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/bookreview/oec_trial/oec_trial_8.htm" target="_blank">latest chapter</a> to be reviewed has just been posted to the website.  Chapter 8 is one of the longest chapters, and once again, Ruben Baron has done an excellent job in pointing out the faults of this young earth book.</p>
<p><em>NOTE:  Anyone can comment without registering.  All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible.  Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/07/24/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Already Gone?</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/06/09/already-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/06/09/already-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers in genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken ham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book by Answers in Genesis examines the exodus of people from the church.  Ken Ham blames this exodus on compromising Christians who believe in an old earth.  He fails to realize that young earth creationism is the reason for the exodus.  Click here to read more.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new book by Answers in Genesis examines the exodus of people from the church.  Ken Ham blames this exodus on compromising Christians who believe in an old earth.  He fails to realize that young earth creationism is the reason for the exodus.  <a title="Already Gone" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/rebuttal/aig/daily/2009/20090609_already_gone.htm" target="_blank">Click here</a> to read more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/06/09/already-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Earth Creationism on Trial &#8211; Chapter 7</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/06/03/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-7/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/06/03/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The book review of Old Earth Creationism on Trial (by Answers in Genesis) is now up to Chapter 7.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book review of Old Earth Creationism on Trial (by Answers in Genesis) is now up to <a title="Chapter 7" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/bookreview/oec_trial/oec_trial_7.htm" target="_blank">Chapter 7</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/06/03/old-earth-creationism-on-trial-chapter-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Universality of the Flood</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/28/universality-of-the-flood/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/28/universality-of-the-flood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers in genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Answers Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john whitcomb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Young earth author John Whitcomb speaks about the universality of the flood to prove that it was global in nature.  However, most of the evidence he uses also supports the old earth local flood scenario, and in some cases, it is a much better explanation.  Click here for the review of this Answers Magazine article from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Young earth author John Whitcomb speaks about the universality of the flood to prove that it was global in nature.  However, most of the evidence he uses also supports the old earth local flood scenario, and in some cases, it is a much better explanation.  <a title="Universality of the Flood" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/rebuttal/aig/Answers/2007/answers_v2_n2_universality_flood.htm" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the review of this Answers Magazine article from Answers in Genesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/28/universality-of-the-flood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sand Transported Cross Country</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/25/sand-transported-cross-country/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/25/sand-transported-cross-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Snelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Answers Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the fourth installment of Andrew Snelling&#8217;s Flood evidences from Answers Magazine, he claims that sand that is transported cross country is evidence of Noah&#8217;s global flood.  He makes baseless claims that old earth geologists don&#8217;t have a clue about how geologic processes could have done it.  We do have many clues, but Snelling would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fourth installment of Andrew Snelling&#8217;s Flood evidences from Answers Magazine, he claims that sand that is transported cross country is evidence of Noah&#8217;s global flood.  He makes baseless claims that old earth geologists don&#8217;t have a clue about how geologic processes could have done it.  We do have many clues, but Snelling would only refuse to believe them.  <a title="Sand Transported Cross Country" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/rebuttal/aig/Answers/2008/answers_v3_n4_sand_transport.htm" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the rebuttal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/25/sand-transported-cross-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snakes and the Curse</title>
		<link>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/06/snakes-and-the-curse/</link>
		<comments>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/06/snakes-and-the-curse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>GN</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Answers in Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers in genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary vaterlaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://answersincreation.org/blog/?p=101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s Answers in Genesis daily article by Gary Vaterlaus is about the apparent contradiction in the BIble concerning snakes eating dust.  While I agree with AiG&#8217;s answer to this issue, there are other points made in the article which are questionable.  To read the Answers In Creation rebuttal to this article, click here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s Answers in Genesis daily article by Gary Vaterlaus is about the apparent contradiction in the BIble concerning snakes eating dust.  While I agree with AiG&#8217;s answer to this issue, there are other points made in the article which are questionable.  To read the Answers In Creation rebuttal to this article, <a title="Contradictions: Left in the Dust" href="http://www.answersincreation.org/rebuttal/aig/daily/2009/20090406_snake.htm" target="_blank">click here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://answersincreation.org/blog/2009/04/06/snakes-and-the-curse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

