Answers In Creation Blog
Jul 14
The Institute for Creation Research is making a claim that Noah’s Flood killed the dinosaurs in a massive Canadian dinosaur graveyard. When you peel back the claims and examine the research from the actual scientists who studied the graveyard, there is no actual proof that it was Noah’s Flood. Click here for more.
[...more]
Posted: under Dinosaurs, Institute for Creation Research.
Tags: dinosaur, graveyard, Institute for Creation Research, noah's flood
The Institute for Creation Research is making a claim that Noah’s Flood killed the dinosaurs in a massive Canadian dinosaur graveyard. When you peel back the claims and examine the research from the actual scientists who studied the graveyard, there is no actual proof that it was Noah’s Flood. Click here for more.
Jan 20
This article, previously published in 2003, is one of our most read articles. Since it was created prior to the blog, readers have no place to comment on it. This blog entry is being made so that readers may comment on it. The article can be found here.
Greg
NOTE: Anyone can comment without registering. All comments [...] [...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs.
Tags: dinosaur, old earth
This article, previously published in 2003, is one of our most read articles. Since it was created prior to the blog, readers have no place to comment on it. This blog entry is being made so that readers may comment on it. The article can be found here.
Greg
NOTE: Anyone can comment without registering. All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible. Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.
Sep 02
A follow-up to the pterosaur landing track article by the Institute for Creation Science further claims that this is evidence of Noah’s Flood. However, it shows a basic misunderstanding of the theory of uniformitarianism. Click here for more.
NOTE: Anyone can comment without registering. All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible. [...] [...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs, Institute for Creation Research.
Tags: Institute for Creation Research, pterosaur, trackway
A follow-up to the pterosaur landing track article by the Institute for Creation Science further claims that this is evidence of Noah’s Flood. However, it shows a basic misunderstanding of the theory of uniformitarianism. Click here for more.
NOTE: Anyone can comment without registering. All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible. Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.
Aug 31
A new study shows how pterosaurs landed, and the Institute for Creation Research tries to use this to show how evolution could not account for the development of the landing technique of these animals. The explanation fails to explain why there is a landing trackway in sediments deposited by Noah’s Flood. Click here to read the article.
NOTE: [...] [...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs, Institute for Creation Research.
Tags: Institute for Creation Research, pterosaur
A new study shows how pterosaurs landed, and the Institute for Creation Research tries to use this to show how evolution could not account for the development of the landing technique of these animals. The explanation fails to explain why there is a landing trackway in sediments deposited by Noah’s Flood. Click here to read the article.
NOTE: Anyone can comment without registering. All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible. Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.
Aug 01
A news report by the Instutute for Creation Research shows that YECs don’t mind being hypocritical so long as it supports their cause. The article in question is about dinosaur skin that “looks young.” Click here for more.
NOTE: Anyone can comment without registering. All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible. [...] [...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs, Institute for Creation Research.
Tags: dinosaur, instutute for creation research, skin
A news report by the Instutute for Creation Research shows that YECs don’t mind being hypocritical so long as it supports their cause. The article in question is about dinosaur skin that “looks young.” Click here for more.
NOTE: Anyone can comment without registering. All comments are held pending review, and will not be immediately visible. Off-topic comments (especially those with non-related links) will be deleted.
Jun 12
In a classic example of young earth deception, Brian Thomas of the Institute for Creation Research misleads his readers concerning the report of dinosaurs surviving past the end of the Cretaceous Period. Judging from the source material that he used, he must have willfully decided to ignore the scientific data in an effort to argue for a young [...] [...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs, Institute for Creation Research.
Tags: Brian Thomas, dinosaur, Institute for Creation Research, tombstone
In a classic example of young earth deception, Brian Thomas of the Institute for Creation Research misleads his readers concerning the report of dinosaurs surviving past the end of the Cretaceous Period. Judging from the source material that he used, he must have willfully decided to ignore the scientific data in an effort to argue for a young earth. Apparently, it is more important to argue for a young earth than it is to be truthful in reporting the facts. Click here to read the rebuttal.
Jun 10
Dinosaur soft tissue is again in the news. This time, the specimen is an 80 million year old hadrosaur. Young earth creationists have jumped on this claim, again stating that the earth must be young. Click here to read more about this Institute for Creation Research claim.
[...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs, Institute for Creation Research.
Tags: dinosaur, Institute for Creation Research, soft tissue
Dinosaur soft tissue is again in the news. This time, the specimen is an 80 million year old hadrosaur. Young earth creationists have jumped on this claim, again stating that the earth must be young. Click here to read more about this Institute for Creation Research claim.
Apr 18
Tas Walker of Creation Ministries International reports on a find of a herd from a single dinosaur species, that apparently was killed in one event, which he claims to be Noah’s global flood. However, the evidence to support his claim is non-existant. Click here to read the review of this claim.
[...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Creation Ministries International, Dinosaurs.
Tags: Creation Ministries International, dinosaur herd, noah's flood, tas walker
Tas Walker of Creation Ministries International reports on a find of a herd from a single dinosaur species, that apparently was killed in one event, which he claims to be Noah’s global flood. However, the evidence to support his claim is non-existant. Click here to read the review of this claim.
Apr 02
Brian Thomas of the Institute for Creation Research claims that feather-like fibers found on a non-therapod dinosaur damages the evolutionary claim that birds evolve from dinosaurs. Not true at all, when you think about it. Click here for the review.
[...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs, Institute for Creation Research.
Tags: Brian Thomas, dinosaur, feather, fibers, Institute for Creation Research
Brian Thomas of the Institute for Creation Research claims that feather-like fibers found on a non-therapod dinosaur damages the evolutionary claim that birds evolve from dinosaurs. Not true at all, when you think about it. Click here for the review.
Mar 30
As is typical of Creation Science Evangelism, they use humor, instead of science, to mislead their readers. When they do use science, they use it incorrectly, or omit vital facts that would discredit their beliefs. The article “Chickenosaurus” from their website is an excellent example of how they mislead their readers. To read the rebuttal [...] [...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Creation Science Evangelism, Dinosaurs.
Tags: chickenosaurus, creation science evangelism, dinosaur
As is typical of Creation Science Evangelism, they use humor, instead of science, to mislead their readers. When they do use science, they use it incorrectly, or omit vital facts that would discredit their beliefs. The article “Chickenosaurus” from their website is an excellent example of how they mislead their readers. To read the rebuttal for this dinosaur article, click here.
Greg Neyman
Oct 28
Answers Magazine published an article by YEC Paul Taylor which tries to discredit the theory that the dinosaur extinction was caused by a meteorite impact. The article contains three problems with the theory, all of which fail to provide any proof against the impact theory. To the contrary, when you do the math, a meteorite [...] [...more]
Posted: under Answers in Genesis, Creation Blog, Dinosaurs.
Tags: dinosaur, extinction, iridium, k-t boundary
Answers Magazine published an article by YEC Paul Taylor which tries to discredit the theory that the dinosaur extinction was caused by a meteorite impact. The article contains three problems with the theory, all of which fail to provide any proof against the impact theory. To the contrary, when you do the math, a meteorite impact makes much more sense than his theory that the iridium in the K-T Boundary came from volcanoes. You can read my rebuttal here.
Oct 22
I’ve added the news feed from the dinosaur news website to the Answers In Creation dinosaur page. It is a great resource to keep you up to date on all news related to dinosaurs.
Greg Neyman
[...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs.
Tags: dinosaur, news
I’ve added the news feed from the dinosaur news website to the Answers In Creation dinosaur page. It is a great resource to keep you up to date on all news related to dinosaurs.
Greg Neyman
Oct 15
I’ve just posted a new article answering a claim by ICR (Institute for Creation Research) about the supposed dinosaur mummy Leonardo. It can be found here.
Greg Neyman
[...more]
Posted: under Creation Blog, Dinosaurs, Institute for Creation Research.
Tags: dinosaur, mummy
I’ve just posted a new article answering a claim by ICR (Institute for Creation Research) about the supposed dinosaur mummy Leonardo. It can be found here.
Greg Neyman